myBibleHistory

Ancient Mysteries & Interpretations

The Book of Giants

An Aramaic work of the Enochic tradition, known from fragments of several Dead Sea Scrolls, tells the giants' own story: ominous dreams, a visit to Enoch for their meaning, and the coming judgment. Two of its giants bear the names of Gilgamesh and Humbaba from the Mesopotamian epic.

Ancient text: documented in fragments · Not part of any Bible · Events: not historically testable

1 What Scripture says

Genesis 6:4 mentions the Nephilim "in those days, and also after that." Numbers 13:33 links them to the Anakim; Deuteronomy 3:11 describes the giant bed of Og, "of the remnant of giants" (Rephaim). The Bible says no more.

2 What evidence we might expect

  • Manuscripts of the work itself, with a date range from their script.
  • Signs of how Jewish writers connected Genesis with the wider world of ancient stories.

3 What ancient sources survive

The Book of Giants

Language
Aramaic
Composed
3rd–2nd century BC
Oldest surviving copy
Fragments of about 6–10 Qumran manuscripts, including 1Q23, 2Q26, 4Q203, 4Q530, 4Q531, 4Q532 and 6Q8, mostly 1st century BC–1st century AD
Status
Not scripture in any surviving Jewish or Christian tradition; later used as scripture by the Manichaeans

The fragments are small, and the order of episodes is partly reconstructed.

Source: Leon Levy Dead Sea Scrolls Digital Library (Israel Antiquities Authority) ↗; L. T. Stuckenbruck, The Book of Giants from Qumran (Mohr Siebeck, 1997)

The Manichaean Book of Giants

Language
Middle Persian, Sogdian, Uyghur, and others
Composed
3rd century AD (adapted by Mani)
Oldest surviving copy
Fragments from Turfan in western China, published by W. B. Henning in 1943
Status
Scripture of the Manichaean religion (extinct)

A later reworking; it must not be confused with the older Aramaic fragments.

Source: W. B. Henning, "The Book of the Giants," BSOAS 11 (1943): the Manichaean fragments from Turfan

4 What discoveries exist

  • The giants Ohyah and Hahyah, sons of the Watcher Shemihazah, have disturbing dreams: a garden whose trees are uprooted, and a stone tablet submerged in water.
  • The giant Mahaway flies to Enoch to ask the meaning; Enoch sends back a tablet announcing judgment.
  • A giant named Gilgamesh (glgmš) appears in 4Q530 and 4Q531, and another named Hobabish, apparently the monster Humbaba of the Gilgamesh epic.

The appearance of Gilgamesh is remarkable: a Jewish author of the Hellenistic age knew the hero of Mesopotamia's most famous epic and placed him among the condemned giants before the Flood. It is direct evidence of contact between Jewish and Mesopotamian literature.

5 How interpretations compare

Scholarly reconstruction

A Jewish expansion of Genesis

Scholars see the work as part of the Enochic tradition, elaborating the giants' fate and absorbing Mesopotamian heroes into a biblical frame, perhaps as a polemic against the prestige of Babylonian legend.

Source: L. T. Stuckenbruck, The Book of Giants from Qumran (Mohr Siebeck, 1997)

Alternative explanation

A lost chapter of Genesis?

Popular sources sometimes call it a "missing" or "banned" part of the Bible.

Assessment: There is no evidence it was ever part of Genesis or of the Hebrew Bible. It was a separate work, read at Qumran alongside 1 Enoch.

Modern speculative theory

Hybrid beings from elsewhere

Ancient-astronaut writers read the giants as offspring of extraterrestrials.

Assessment: The fragments describe the giants in religious and moral terms; they offer no physical or historical evidence for this reading.

6 The strongest supported reconstruction

The Book of Giants is an authentic ancient Jewish work, known from real manuscripts, that tells the story of Genesis 6's Nephilim and links them to Mesopotamian heroes. It is evidence of ancient interpretation and cultural contact, not of the giants themselves.

7 What remains possible or unknown

  • The work's original length and order.
  • Exactly how its author knew the Gilgamesh tradition.
  • Whether it was ever considered authoritative at Qumran.

8 How this material came to us

Aramaic original (Qumran copies) → adopted and reworked by Mani in the 3rd century AD → Manichaean versions in Central Asian languages, rediscovered at Turfan (1900s) → Qumran fragments identified by J. T. Milik and published in full by Loren Stuckenbruck and others.

What the evidence shows

  • Independently documentedFragments of the Aramaic Book of Giants survive among the Dead Sea Scrolls.

    Source: L. T. Stuckenbruck, The Book of Giants from Qumran (Mohr Siebeck, 1997); Leon Levy Dead Sea Scrolls Digital Library (Israel Antiquities Authority) ↗

  • Independently documentedGilgamesh is named as one of the giants in two Qumran fragments.

    Source: L. T. Stuckenbruck, The Book of Giants from Qumran (Mohr Siebeck, 1997)

  • Conflicts with current evidenceThe Book of Giants was removed from Genesis. It was always a separate work.

Where this connects