myBibleHistory

Ancient Mysteries & Interpretations

Does the Song of Songs Name God?

The Song of Songs, with Esther, is one of two biblical books that seem never to name God. The exception may be in 8:6: "the coals thereof are coals of fire, shalhevetyah." If -yah is the divine name, the phrase is "a flame of the LORD"; if it is a superlative, "a mighty flame." The Masoretic Text writes it as one word; a medieval Masoretic tradition is reported to have written two; the Greek and Latin have no divine name; modern translations divide. The oath "by the gazelles (tseva'ot) and the hinds of the field" (2:7; 3:5) also sounds like divine titles. The evidence is real on both sides.

Divine name in 8:6: disputed · Superlative reading: well supported · Two-word Masoretic tradition: reported, C check · Divine-name echoes in 2:7: plausible

Seal impression of King Hezekiah
Authentic ancient artifactSeal impression of "Hezekiah, son of Ahaz, king of Judah" (8th century BC), found in Jerusalem (Israel Museum).Image credit

1 What Scripture says

Song of Songs 2:7; 3:5

"Set me as a seal upon thine heart, as a seal upon thine arm: for love is strong as death; jealousy is cruel as the grave: the coals thereof are coals of fire, which hath a most vehement flame (shalhevetyah). Many waters cannot quench love, neither can the floods drown it" (Song of Songs 8:6–7).

2 What evidence we might expect

  • If -yah is the divine name, we might expect some manuscripts or ancient translators to show it (two words, or a translation like "flame of the Lord").
  • If it is a superlative, we should find other Hebrew words formed the same way with a superlative sense.

3 What ancient sources survive

Masoretic Text (Leningrad Codex)

Language
Hebrew
Composed
Song: date debated
Oldest surviving copy
Leningrad Codex, AD 1008 (the Aleppo Codex is lost from Song 3:11)
Status
Scripture (Jewish and Christian)

Shalhevetyah written as one word.

Greek Song of Songs

Language
Greek
Composed
1st century BC – 1st century AD (debated)
Oldest surviving copy
4th–5th-century codices (Vaticanus, Sinaiticus, Alexandrinus)
Status
Scripture in Greek-speaking churches

No divine name: "its flames" (library's Giguet: "ce sont ses flammes"). C check against a critical Greek edition.

Latin Vulgate

Language
Latin
Composed
Jerome, c. AD 390s
Oldest surviving copy
Codex Amiatinus (c. AD 700)
Status
Scripture (Latin West)

"lampades ignis atque flammarum": no divine name.

Qumran copies of the Song

Language
Hebrew
Composed
—
Oldest surviving copy
4Q106–108, 6Q6 (late 1st century BC – 1st century AD)
Status
Scripture at Qumran

Whether any preserves 8:6 is a C check (S-C04).

4 What discoveries exist

Comparative Hebrew grammar supplies close parallels: merchavyah (Psalm 118:5, "a broad place" or "the LORD's broad place") and ma'pelyah (Jeremiah 2:31, "thick darkness" or "darkness of Yah"). In both, translators divide between a superlative and a divine name.

Medieval Masoretic lists recording differences between the Ben Asher and Ben Naphtali traditions are reported to include this word (one word or two). This must be checked in the Masoretic sources (S-C02).

5 How interpretations compare

Scholarly reconstruction

Superlative: "a mighty flame"

-yah intensifies, as divine names sometimes do ("mountains of God" = mighty mountains). The Song elsewhere avoids God's name, and the Greek and Latin read no name.

Evidence offered: Merchavyah and ma'pelyah; the ancient translations; the book's general silence about God.

Assessment: Well supported; the reading of the KJV, NJPS and many scholars.

Source: NET Bible, note on Song 8:6 ↗

Scholarly reconstruction

Divine name: "a flame of the LORD"

Yah is the LORD's name, placed at the poem's climax: love's fire is God's fire.

Evidence offered: Yah is a well-known short form (Exodus 15:2; Psalm 118:14); the reported two-word tradition; the poem's climactic placement.

Assessment: Possible; printed in the margin of the NRSV and ESV and in the text of some versions.

Source: J. C. Exum, Song of Songs: A Commentary (Old Testament Library, 2005)

Scholarly reconstruction

Deliberate double sense

The poet chose a word that can be heard both ways: a superlative that also hints at God.

Assessment: Attractive, unprovable.

Traditional reading

Reception: love as divine

Jewish and Christian allegorical readers did not need the grammar: for them the whole Song speaks of God's love, and 8:6 of love stronger than death (Israel's martyrs; Christ's passion).

Assessment: Later reading, not a solution to the grammatical question.

6 The strongest supported reconstruction

The safest statement is that the Song may name God once, inside a word whose grammar is disputed, and that if it does, it names God as the fire of love.

7 What remains possible or unknown

  • Whether the poet intended a divine name.
  • Whether the two-word Masoretic tradition is correctly reported and how old it is.
  • Whether any Qumran copy preserves 8:6.

8 How this material came to us

The Hebrew word has been copied as one word in the standard Masoretic tradition; translators since antiquity have mostly rendered it without a divine name; modern translations have reopened the question in their notes.

What the evidence shows

  • DisputedThe Song may name God once, in 8:6.
  • Independently documentedThe Greek and Latin translations of 8:6 have no divine name.

    Source: The site's library: Westminster Leningrad Codex, KJV, Clementine Vulgate, Giguet's French of the Greek

  • DisputedThe Song certainly never mentions God.

Where this connects