myBibleHistory

Journey of a Passage

1 John 5:7–8

The three that bear record in heaven

The King James wording includes a clear statement of the Trinity that is absent from early Greek manuscripts. Here is how it entered the text.

Disputed addition: some witnesses include it, some do not

The family tree

Each row is a language or text tradition. Witnesses in the same row may share ancestry, revise one another, or have an uncertain relationship; the line under each box says which. A solid arrow appears only where direct copying or a documented revised edition is established. Order by date never implies copying. Scroll sideways on a phone.

✓ includes the disputed words · ✕ does not include them · ❝ quotes part of them · ⓘ reports on manuscripts · ▢ pages lost · – no copy survives

Side by side

Early Greek manuscripts
For there are three that testify: the Spirit, the water, and the blood; and these three agree.
King James Bible (1611)
For there are three that bear record in heaven, the Father, the Word, and the Holy Ghost: and these three are one. And there are three that bear witness in earth, the Spirit, and the water, and the blood: and these three agree in one.

Every witness, in order

  1. c. AD 90–110

    Original letter of 1 John

    – No copy survives

    The original does not survive.

  2. 4th–5th century

    Sinaiticus, Vaticanus, Alexandrinus

    ✕ Passage not in this witness (the disputed words)Descends, through lost copies, from Original letter of 1 John

    How the site knows this: Reported in scholarship; not checked by the site.

    For there are three that testify: the Spirit, the water, and the blood; and these three agree.

    The early Greek text, without the added words about the Father, the Word, and the Holy Spirit. This is the reading of essentially all Greek manuscripts for over a thousand years.

    Page of Codex Sinaiticus
    Historical manuscriptImage credit

    Pictured: a page of Matthew in Sinaiticus.

  3. c. AD 380

    Priscillian, Liber Apologeticus

    ❝ Quotes or alludes to part of itUncertain relationship to a Latin comment or tradition in Spain

    How the site knows this: Reported in scholarship; not checked by the site.

    The earliest clear appearance of the added words, in a Latin writer in Spain. They may have begun as a comment explaining the passage.

  4. 6th–8th century

    Early Vulgate manuscripts

    ✕ Passage not in this witness (the disputed words)Descends, through lost copies, from Jerome's Vulgate (c. AD 400)

    How the site knows this: Reported in scholarship; not checked by the site.

    The oldest Vulgate manuscripts, such as Codex Fuldensis (546) and Codex Amiatinus (c. 700), do not have the added words in the text.

  5. 9th century onward

    Later Vulgate manuscripts

    ✓ Contains this passage (the disputed words)Descends, through lost copies, from Early Vulgate manuscripts

    How the site knows this: Reported in scholarship; not checked by the site.

    In heaven: the Father, the Word, and the Holy Spirit…

    From the 9th century (for example Codex Cavensis), the added words appear in Latin copies and became standard in the medieval Western church.

  6. 1516 and 1519

    Erasmus' Greek New Testament

    ✕ Passage not in this witness (the disputed words)Copied or printed directly from later Greek manuscripts in Basel

    How the site knows this: Reported in scholarship; not checked by the site.

    Erasmus printed the Greek without the added words, because the later Greek manuscripts he used in Basel (for these letters, chiefly a 12th-century copy now called GA 2815) lacked them. He did not use Sinaiticus, Vaticanus, or Alexandrinus.

    Source: Andrew J. Brown, ed., Novum Testamentum ab Erasmo recognitum, Opera Omnia of Erasmus (ASD VI-1 to VI-4, 2008–2013); Basel University Library manuscripts Erasmus used, digitized (e-manuscripta.ch) ↗

  7. c. 1520

    Codex Montfortianus (GA 61)

    ✓ Contains this passage (the disputed words)Uncertain relationship to Latin Vulgate wording, apparently put into Greek

    How the site knows this: Reported in scholarship; not checked by the site.

    A Greek manuscript copied around 1520, probably in England. It is the source Erasmus used for the added words in 1522.

  8. 1522

    Erasmus' third edition

    ✓ Contains this passage (the disputed words)Revised edition of Erasmus' Greek New Testament

    How the site knows this: Reported in scholarship; not checked by the site.

    In heaven: the Father, the Word, and the Holy Spirit…

    A revision of his earlier editions. After criticism, Erasmus added the words in 1522, taking them from a Greek manuscript produced around 1520 (Codex Montfortianus, GA 61), whose wording appears to have been translated from the Latin. Only about eight or nine Greek manuscripts, all late and several in the margin, have them.

  9. 1522–1633

    Received Text (Textus Receptus)

    ✓ Contains this passage (the disputed words)Revised edition of Erasmus' third edition

    How the site knows this: Reported in scholarship; not checked by the site.

    The later printed Greek editions (Stephanus 1550, Beza) kept the words from Erasmus' third edition.

  10. 1611

    King James Bible

    ✓ Contains this passage (the disputed words)Translated from Received Text (Textus Receptus)

    How the site knows this: Read in the site's library text: King James Version (1769 text).

    For there are three that beare record in heauen, the Father, the Word, and the holy Ghost: and these three are one. And there are three that beare witnesse in earth, the Spirit, and the Water, and the blood, and these three agree in one.

    Translated from the printed Received Text editions, which kept the words.

  11. today

    Modern Bibles

    ✕ Passage not in this witness (the disputed words)Modern edition based on critical Greek editions based on the early manuscripts

    How the site knows this: Checked in a published edition.

    For there are three that testify: the Spirit, the water and the blood; and the three are in agreement.

    Translate the early Greek text and mention the added words in a footnote.

    Source: NIV ↗; KJV ↗

What changed, and why

Almost all scholars, including those who hold firmly to the Trinity, agree the added words were not part of 1 John. They seem to have begun in Latin as an explanatory reading and only entered Greek printed Bibles in the 1500s.

What the evidence shows

  • Independently documentedThe added words are absent from Greek manuscripts before the late Middle Ages.

    Source: Metzger, Textual Commentary on the Greek NT, 2nd ed. (1994), pp. 647–649

  • Independently documentedThey first appear in Latin around AD 380.
  • Independently documentedErasmus added them in his 1522 edition.
  • Conflicts with current evidenceThe doctrine of the Trinity depends on this verse. The doctrine was taught and defined long before the words appeared.

Sources

  • Metzger, A Textual Commentary on the Greek New Testament, 2nd ed. (1994)
  • Metzger & Ehrman, The Text of the New Testament, 4th ed. (2005)

Related lessons