myBibleHistory

Ancient Mysteries & Interpretations

Jericho: Did the Walls Fall?

Tell es-Sultan, ancient Jericho, has the remains of a fortified city destroyed by fire, with collapsed walls and storage jars still full of grain. Excavators agree on the destruction. They disagree on its date: most place it in the 16th century BC; a minority argue for about 1400 BC, matching an early Exodus. No large walled city of the 13th century BC has been found.

Site: secure · Destruction: real · Date: disputed (majority 16th century BC) · Link to Joshua: disputed

The mound of ancient Jericho
Site or place photographTell es-Sultan, the mound of ancient Jericho.Image credit

1 What Scripture says

"So the people shouted when the priests blew with the trumpets… and the wall fell down flat… And they burnt the city with fire" (Joshua 6:20, 24).

2 What evidence we might expect

  • A walled city in the period of the conquest.
  • Evidence of collapse and burning.
  • Little looting of food, if the city was devoted to destruction.

3 What discoveries exist

ResearcherYearsConclusion
John Garstang1930–36City IV destroyed c. 1400 BC; walls fallen
Kathleen Kenyon1952–58City IV destroyed c. 1550 BC; Garstang's walls Early Bronze; little 13th-century occupation
Bryant Wood1990Pottery and scarabs support c. 1400 BC
H. J. Bruins and J. van der Plicht1995Radiocarbon on short-lived grain: 16th century BC
Italian-Palestinian Expedition (L. Nigro)1997–Middle Bronze destruction; modest Late Bronze remains
Titus Kennedy2023Re-argues c. 1400 BC
The mound of ancient Jericho
Site or place photographTell es-Sultan, the mound of ancient Jericho.Image credit

The physical evidence: a stone revetment wall with a mudbrick wall on top; collapsed bricks piled at the base of the revetment in places; a burn layer about a meter thick; dozens of storage jars full of charred grain. Jericho lies on the Jordan rift, an active earthquake zone, and an earthquake has been proposed as a cause of the collapse; that is a physical possibility, not an established cause.

4 How interpretations compare

Scholarly reconstruction

Middle Bronze destruction (16th century)

City IV fell around 1550 BC, perhaps in Egyptian campaigns after the expulsion of the Hyksos; there was no major city for Joshua to conquer in the 13th century.

Source: K. M. Kenyon, Digging Up Jericho (1957); Excavations at Jericho III (1981); H. J. Bruins and J. van der Plicht, "Tell es-Sultan (Jericho): Radiocarbon Results of Short-Lived Cereal and Multiyear Charcoal Samples from the End of the Middle Bronze Age," Radiocarbon 37 (1995) ↗; L. Nigro, Italian-Palestinian Expedition to Tell es-Sultan (1997–), excavation reports

Scholarly reconstruction

Erosion

Late Bronze remains existed but eroded away, leaving the story's setting invisible.

Assessment: Possible but untestable; Kenyon found some Late Bronze tombs and a building.

Scholarly reconstruction

Etiology

The story was told to explain the impressive ruins of an older city.

5 The strongest supported reconstruction

Jericho was a real walled city destroyed violently. The majority of the evidence dates that destruction to the 16th century BC, earlier than the usual dates for Joshua; a minority argues for about 1400 BC. The archaeology cannot show who or what destroyed the city.

6 What remains possible or unknown

  • The exact date of City IV's destruction.
  • The extent of Late Bronze occupation.
  • The cause of the wall collapse.

What the evidence shows

Where this connects