myBibleHistory

Era 8 · The Fall2 Chronicles

Evidence Case: External Evidence for Judah's Kings

What each object proves, and what it cannot prove

· Lesson 37 of 41 · 12 min story

EvidenceChroniclesWhat it showsWhat it cannot show
Shoshenq I, Karnak (c. 925 BC)12:2–9An Egyptian campaign into the Levant in Rehoboam's timeThat Jerusalem's temple was plundered
Tiglath-pileser III (c. 734 BC)28:16–21Ahaz (Jehoahaz) of Judah paid tributeChronicles' verdict that Assyria "strengthened him not"
Hezekiah bulla, Ophel (8th c. BC)29–32A king Hezekiah son of Ahaz of Judah sealed documentsAny specific act
Sennacherib's prisms and Lachish reliefs (701 BC)32:1–23The campaign; Lachish destroyed; Jerusalem not takenThe angel or the number of dead
Siloam tunnel and inscription32:30A tunnel from Gihon, c. 700 BCThe builder's name
Esarhaddon, Ashurbanipal (7th c. BC)33Manasseh, a loyal vassalHis captivity and repentance
Babylonian Chronicle (609, 597 BC)35:20; 36:10Necho aiding Assyria; Jerusalem taken in 597Josiah's motives; the 586 destruction
Jehoiachin ration tablets36:9–10Jehoiachin a captive at BabylonHis age at accession
Cyrus Cylinder (539 BC)36:22–23Cyrus' policy of restoring temples and peoplesA decree for Jerusalem

Continue the journey

Journey of a Passage1 Kings 14:25–26: Shishak and Shoshenq: a text and an inscriptionThis is not a manuscript variant: all the witnesses checked agree that Shishak king of Egypt came up against Jerusalem in Rehoboam's fifth year.
More from this lesson

Investigations

Optional deep dives: the ancient sources, the physical evidence, and every interpretation side by side, including unconventional ones, each labeled for what it is.

The Cyrus CylinderCylinder: documented · Policy of restoration: documented · Mention of Jerusalem: none

Does the Cyrus Cylinder record the decree to rebuild Jerusalem's temple?

The Cyrus Cylinder, a clay cylinder found at Babylon in 1879 (British Museum 1880,0617.1941), is a Babylonian building inscription in Cyrus' name after he took Babylon in 539 BC. It presents Cyrus as chosen by Marduk, and says he returned gods to their sanctuaries and gathered their former inhabitants. It names cities east of the Tigris, not Judah or Jerusalem. It shows a policy consistent with the biblical decree; it is not that decree.

Open the full investigation →

Why this matters to the rest of Scripture